Hawzah News Agency- Sayyed Abdulmalik Badreddin al-Houthi has asserted that the "Al-Aqsa Storm" operation represented an "unprecedented" success in the history of the conflict with the Israeli enemy. In his speech marking the operation's second anniversary, he directed sharp criticism at Arab regimes, describing their stance as one of "negligence and incitement" in favor of the enemy, contrasting it with the "American-Western initiative to support Israel''.
He described "Al-Aqsa Storm" as occurring within the context of a "sacred cause" and a position of truth and legitimacy, affirming that it was achieved "by God's grace in an unprecedented manner" despite the severe siege, Arab abandonment, and a "campaign of distortion in some Arab media outlets working for the benefit of the Israeli enemy''.
He indicated that the operation's great performance embodied "all military standards at the highest levels of success" and represented a "very major shock that shook the Israeli enemy and all its supporters'', leaving the enemy in a state of "staggering, comprehensive confusion, and immense psychological and moral defeat''.
Sayyed Abdulmalik strongly criticized the reaction of Muslims and Arab regimes to the battle, considering it a "great and important opportunity for Muslims had they performed their duty and immediately initiated" support and backing for the Palestinian people.
He expressed regret over the "Muslims' immediate initiative towards negligence'', noting that some regimes adopted a "very negative stance to the point of inciting the Americans and Israelis against the Palestinian people." He warned that "squandering great opportunities poses a danger to the nation" and could lead to "very serious divine punishments''.
The leader affirmed that the "path of freezing the nation through its regimes" has shackled the nation, leaving it without a real stance, where the "highest ceiling is issuing statements and declarations''. He pointed out that Arab and Islamic regimes did not proceed to the level of "diplomatic and economic boycott"; rather, the Arabs "maintained the American ceiling''.
He noted that Arab and Islamic regimes did not even proceed to open the Rafah crossing from the first day to support the Palestinian people, emphasizing the continuation of support for the enemy by some regimes. He revealed that "major regimes remained keen on continuing economic support for the Israeli enemy at a pace greater than any previous time''.
He highlighted that the "flow of ships from the ports of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE, Turkey, and Bahrain to the enemy reached levels and rates higher than any past stages," considering that "maintaining diplomatic relations with the enemy was part of the American stance''.
In contrast to the Arab stance, Sayyed Abdulmalik pointed to the "rapid and intensive initiative from the enemies of the nation to rescue Israel when it was on the verge of collapse." He indicated that the American move, which leads the Western Zionist move, proceeded on two parallel tracks:
One track involved providing all forms of support to the Israeli enemy, and the other track involved "freezing the nation through its regimes." American military support began "immediately with an air bridge" to transport weapons, send military experts, mobilize forces in the region, and activate military bases in Arab countries.
He affirmed that the enemy's goal, in partnership with America, was to fully occupy the Gaza Strip, achieve comprehensive destruction and forced displacement, end the resistance, and recover captives without a prisoner exchange deal. However, the aggression shifted towards "genocide and starvation," in the "biggest scandal for the Israeli enemy and its supporters''.
He stressed that the Palestinian steadfastness in the Gaza Strip was "great, immense, and unprecedented" in the face of brutality and Arab abandonment, as the people and mujahideen held onto their rights and remained firm despite the opening of avenues for departure.
He confirmed that the enemy "completely failed to decisively conclude the battle despite the American partnership and Western support, and failed to recover captives without a deal, end the resistance, or achieve forced displacement''.
The leader pointed out that the enemy incurred many losses, faced a crisis in human resources, and reached a "quagmire in every sense of the word" over two years. The "crimes committed in Gaza led to a change in the global view of the Israeli entity"; the enemy appeared "to all the peoples and countries of the world in its true, very ugly image as a criminal, savage entity''.
He noted that the crimes created "global resentment among free people and those with a human conscience'', with large popular marches emerging in Europe and America, and "free stances from the governments and leaders of some countries" such as "Venezuela, Colombia, and South Africa''.
"What happened affected the reputation of 'Israel' and the United States throughout the world, and the criminal Netanyahu has become 'wanted even by international courts,' as a criminal by global consensus''.
He highlighted that the "global resentment towards the Israeli enemy is unprecedented in the history of the conflict," and pointed to the "American governing institutions that rule and control America'', being "within the Zionist orientation''.
The Israeli enemy launched its genocidal war on Gaza on October 7, 2023, following the historic Al-Aqsa Flood operation carried out by Palestinian resistance fighters, who stormed Zionist military bases and captured hundreds of Israeli soldiers and settlers.
Since then, more than 67,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, have been martyred in relentless Israeli attacks across the Gaza Strip.
Source: Al Masirah
Your Comment