۲۹ تیر ۱۴۰۳ |۱۲ محرم ۱۴۴۶ | Jul 19, 2024
News ID: 367015
18 January 2024 - 16:00
Cleric

Hujjat al-Islam Marvi said,” Studying and analyzing the debates of Imam Reza (PBUH) is remarkable in terms of content and style and can provide a reassuring model for everyone. Imam Reza's debates open the way of guidance to the followers of other religions.”

Hawzah News Agency- Hujjat al-Islam Ahmad Marvi, the custodian of Astan Quds Razavi, delivered a speech at the second international conference of Imam Reza (PBUH) and the interfaith dialogue, on Wednesday, January 17 at the Research Foundation of Astan Quds Razavi, saying that all divine religions that have been bestowed upon humans are for guidance and growth of society. He added,” The difference between religions is in rank, and that is because of compliance with the requirements of the time, and that which is the reason for the growth of human society in the shadow of monotheistic religions.”

He continued,” But the ill-wishers and the materialist have turned this into a conflict between religions.”

Pointing out that in recent decades, religious leaders have seriously raised the issue of inter-religious dialogue and have held various scientific meetings in different countries, he pointed out,” Centuries ago, Imam Reza (PBUH) referred to debate and dialogue among divine religions, Imam Reza (PBUH) is the creator of dialogue between religions, and we hope that this good tradition will continue.”

Hujjat al-Islam Marvi further noted,” The study and analysis of Imam Reza's debates (PBUH) is remarkable in terms of content and style and can provide a reassuring model for everyone. The debates of Hazrat Reza (PBUH) open the way of guidance to the followers of other religions.”

He continued in this regard,” paying attention to the type of debates and the content of debates and their manner has set a very successful model before us.”

The Custodian of Astan Quds Razavi, referring to the Supreme Leader's emphasis on scientific activities that must have an effective output, added,” We must pay special attention to the output of such scientific activities, as long as we are engaged in the field of scientific issues and academic debates. We have no objections, but when these discussions are implemented in the society, we will face problems and obstacles, so we need serious thought for implementation of these debates.”

Comment

You are replying to: .